You want to build many small agents
A platform is cheaper per agent once your own team is the one building them
Agent platforms give you a builder and host what you build. An AI coworker is built for you and deployed inside your own cloud account. The capability gap between the two is smaller than the marketing suggests; the deployment gap is what actually decides the purchase.
Get a demoThree places the two products genuinely diverge. Everything else is a feature list.
See all comparisons →A platform is a tenancy in the vendor’s cloud. A coworker is a service inside your own account
A platform hands your team a builder. This arrives built, tuned against your real cases
The question stops being how you protect our data and becomes whether we can read the code
Feature lists rarely decide this one. The list below does.
Neither product can configure its way out of these; they follow from where the software runs.
A platform is cheaper per agent once your own team is the one building them
Everything here assumes an AWS, Azure, or GCP footprint that you control
A builder in your team’s hands beats a build request, every time
The questions that come up once both are on the shortlist.
Mostly deployment and ownership rather than capability. Agent platforms are hosted by the vendor, so your data has to travel to them, and they hand you a builder to configure. An AI coworker is deployed inside your own cloud account and built for you around one job, so it arrives already knowing how your process works.
Some offer a self-hosted or private tier, usually at enterprise pricing and usually still with a vendor-side control plane. It is worth asking the specific version of the question: which components run in our account, which run in yours, and what crosses between them. The answer is often more nuanced than the marketing page.
It is less general, deliberately. A single-purpose coworker can be tuned against your real exceptions in a way a general builder cannot, and it is far easier to say whether it is working. The trade is flexibility for reliability, and it is a trade rather than a free win.
You add a second coworker rather than reconfiguring the first, and both run in your account under roles you issue. If your team eventually wants to build these itself, nothing in the deployment model prevents that — the infrastructure is already sitting in your account.
Put both against the same real workflow, exceptions included, and ask each vendor where their software runs, who builds it, and who is accountable when it gets something wrong. A demo on clean data does not separate these products; a messy week does.
“Two products can do the same thing and still fail different security reviews. That is the whole comparison.”
Where is our data processed?
answer required before procurement✓ Not a question we have to answerBring the workflow you were going to build on a platform. We will show you the other version.
Get a demo