You want one thing for everyone
Copilots are priced and deployed per seat, which is the right shape for a company-wide rollout
AI coworker
Coverage
Everyone, on day one
A coworker is one job at a time
A coworker is one job at a time
AI coworkers vs copilots
A copilot makes the person doing the work faster. An AI coworker does the work. Both are useful and most teams eventually run both — but they are not substitutes, and buying one while expecting the other is the most common disappointment in this category.
Get a demoCOPILOTAn assistant for the person doing the workWaits to be asked, and stops when that person stopsSees what is on screen, not the systems behind itFinished when you accept the suggestion
versus
AI COWORKERSomething that owns the job itselfNotices the work arriving and picks it up unpromptedHolds scoped credentials to every system the job crossesFinished when the job is done, and reports what it did
A copilot assists a person who is already doing the work and stops when that person stops. An AI coworker picks the work up itself, carries it across every system the task touches, and finishes it — which is how a company ends up with full copilot adoption and a queue that is still full.
Three differences that decide it
Three places the two products genuinely diverge. Everything else is a feature list.
See all comparisons →A copilot waits to be asked. A coworker notices the work arriving and picks it up
A copilot sees what you have open. A coworker holds credentials to every system the job crosses
A copilot is done when you accept the suggestion. A coworker is done when the job is
What buyers actually compare on
Both answer questions well. Only one of them finishes anything.
Who starts the workWho finishes itSystems it reachesRuns unattendedHandles exceptionsOwns an outcomeNeeds a promptWorks overnightWrites to recordsEscalates to a personHow it is pricedHow it is measuredAdoption riskWhere it runs
Both are useful. Only one of them owns a job.
The distinction is not intelligence. It is whether anything happens when nobody is watching.
Copilot
ASSISTS A PERSONCoworker
OWNS A JOBCoworker runs
UNATTENDEDCopilot needs
A PROMPT
ASSISTS A PERSONCoworker
OWNS A JOBCoworker runs
UNATTENDEDCopilot needs
A PROMPT
When a copilot is the better choice
The work is thinking, not moving
Drafting, analysis, and asking questions of your own documents are copilot jobs
Honest answer
AI coworkerIf a person still makes every call, buy them a copilot.
See the definition →Nobody can describe the process
A coworker needs a job with a shape. A copilot needs nothing but a person and a question
Your teamHonestly, it depends every time.
AI coworkerThen this is a copilot problem.
AI coworkers and copilots, compared
Including the question every team with existing seats asks first.
A copilot assists the person doing the work: you ask, it answers, you carry on. An AI coworker owns the work — it picks a task up when it arrives, moves it across every system the task touches, and finishes it. One makes your team faster at their work; the other takes a piece of it away.
Those tools make the people doing the work faster, and they stop when those people stop. If your CRM is still out of date on Friday and the queue still has a backlog on Monday despite everyone having a seat, that gap is what a coworker fills. Most teams keep both.
You can, but a person has to be there driving it, and the result lives in a chat window rather than in your systems. The moment the work has to happen at two in the morning, across four tools, with an exception in the middle, the shape stops fitting.
Copilots are cheaper per person and are priced that way. A coworker is priced against a job rather than a headcount, so the only comparison that means anything is against what the job costs you today in salary and time. We do not publish pricing yet; ask on a call and we will give you a straight number for your situation.
Permissions are part of it, but the real difference is that nobody has to be present. A coworker notices work arriving, decides what to do about it, escalates what it should not decide alone, and reports what it did. That loop is the product, not the model behind it.
“Full copilot adoption and a full inbox are not a contradiction. One of those tools was never going to empty the other.”
Monday, 09:04seats: 400 copilots
Weekend backlog: 47 items.
still 47✓ Nobody was there to prompt onePut an AI coworker
inside your own cloud.
Bring the queue your copilots never touched. We will show you what owns it.
Get a demo